Lactate Threshold Training

[John]

From NZ Secondary School Champs

Whyte (18) took 0.95sec off the senior boys 400m record that Sam Higgie (Palmerston North Boys' High School) ran in 1999.

His time of 46.91sec was a personal-best by 1.19sec and puts him second on the New Zealand senior men's ranking list this season. It was an A qualifying standard for the world junior track and field championships in Barcelona in August next year.

It is an Otago men's aged 18 and 19 record and just 0.34sec off the Otago senior men's record set by Cory Innes nearly six years ago.

Whyte, named as a senior male athlete of the meeting, also ran a personal-best 100m when second to Kodi Harman (Mount Maunganui College) in 10.89sec.

http://www.odt.co.nz/sport/athletics...rds-otago-pair

video
http://www.nzrun.com/coverage/240513...oys-400m-Final

[ESTI]

Depending on their 200m pb, 6x200 in 26 sec model would get them under 50. I did it with my grade 12 kid last spring. He hid the first 5 of 6 in 26 with jog recoveries. 1 week later, broke 50.

Thanks Kitkat1

I have implemented some of your stategies for my guys.

I have got them down to do 27 secs for the 200m, with the aim of 5 x 200 with 200m jog. This is based on my calculations of a 50 second 400m.

They aren't there yet, and as both have lost 4 weeks of training because of illness, work commitments and study commitments. This session has been taken out for a while (maybe the rest of the season for these guys)

Thanks for your help.

[DMA]

Just to let you know, one of my guys had his first hit out using a peaking strategy (just as a test run). For the last 6 weeks we have been building up speed volume due to him missing 4 weeks with illness (similar to Gland Fever).

The athlete run a seasons best, about half a second faster than 2 weeks before when he was under a heavier load. So happy with the result, the athlete sent me a message (as I was at a function) saying I didn't run hard enough in the first 200, our aim was 26 he thinks he hit high 26-low27. After Christmas we will implement more of this thread with the aim being to perform in March.

[pindaman]

Training has been steady and my activity on this forum has been really reduced. As most of the needs are now found in my 400 M training Bible.
I am still working with a modified template that KK shared here already for some years, but now i get older my body doesn't respond as good (easily injured)
For this year in the winter I focussed mainly on acc work, runs up to 150m, aerobic tempo, body weight circuits to prevent injury. Untill now it seems to work, although I do have my tight hamstrings and a chronic calf problem that's controllable at the moment.
recovery is massages and using my LLLT device and allot of showers(warm and sometimes contrast).

I have started getting into the transition after doing a 4 week GPP from the KK template. That went okay.
Now I have some trouble into the SPP because speed is going up a bit rapidly. I changed the template to build up to 300m(+150) runs and the 5x200m with 2' breaks in an alternative way and hoping it will keep me injury free.

I still compare my training times with my best year(2006 setting pb's in 100/10.80 to 400/48.30). some traning results are:
2x4x150 walk/jog/walk -15' av 19.4(set 1)-av 19.0(set2) (late GPP)
300+150 34.8-19.6

This year i was really missing speed in the frst 4 weeks of the GPP, and now getting into SPP times are going down more rapidly than anticipated. My questionis what to do.
Last week i ran a 250-200-180-150 in 31.5-24.6-22.2-18.2 with a 10~12 min break after a 4x80
This week: 250-200 in 30.5-23.8 I had planned to do more runs, but because of the big difference in time i thought it would be best to stop the session to prevent injury. I did stop because in the past I would have run the whole programm and than be destoyed for multiple days...or get injured.

So is this wise to do? I am still in doubt about that. On the one hand I think is was good, to stop so my body can adapt to this step forward. On the other hand I think, I could have run on of my best training runs ever yesterday(but still knowing there was a good change of getting injured).
In the end I think it was a good thing to end the session. What are your thoughts

[kitkat1]

Training has been steady and my activity on this forum has been really reduced. As most of the needs are now found in my 400 M training Bible.
I am still working with a modified template that KK shared here already for some years, but now i get older my body doesn't respond as good (easily injured)
For this year in the winter I focussed mainly on acc work, runs up to 150m, aerobic tempo, body weight circuits to prevent injury. Untill now it seems to work, although I do have my tight hamstrings and a chronic calf problem that's controllable at the moment.
recovery is massages and using my LLLT device and allot of showers(warm and sometimes contrast).

I have started getting into the transition after doing a 4 week GPP from the KK template. That went okay.
Now I have some trouble into the SPP because speed is going up a bit rapidly. I changed the template to build up to 300m(+150) runs and the 5x200m with 2' breaks in an alternative way and hoping it will keep me injury free.

I still compare my training times with my best year(2006 setting pb's in 100/10.80 to 400/48.30). some traning results are:
2x4x150 walk/jog/walk -15' av 19.4(set 1)-av 19.0(set2) (late GPP)
300+150 34.8-19.6

This year i was really missing speed in the frst 4 weeks of the GPP, and now getting into SPP times are going down more rapidly than anticipated. My questionis what to do.
Last week i ran a 250-200-180-150 in 31.5-24.6-22.2-18.2 with a 10~12 min break after a 4x80
This week: 250-200 in 30.5-23.8 I had planned to do more runs, but because of the big difference in time i thought it would be best to stop the session to prevent injury. I did stop because in the past I would have run the whole programm and than be destoyed for multiple days...or get injured.

So is this wise to do? I am still in doubt about that. On the one hand I think is was good, to stop so my body can adapt to this step forward. On the other hand I think, I could have run on of my best training runs ever yesterday(but still knowing there was a good change of getting injured).
In the end I think it was a good thing to end the session. What are your thoughts

You did exactly the correct thing. As Charlie always said: "If in doubt, leave it out. When you think you can do one more rep, you have already done one too many."
Your progress (speed) will continue to come out over the course of your transition into competition. BUt you don't train to train. You need to make it to the racing track, so steady as she does in training will win the race (or does that only apply to turtles?)

[oldspeeder]

As Kit Kat always says; we don't want dead heroes; can't get it through one of my fellow sprinter's head; I always tell him, if you want to do one more rep you've done too many already, he's always injured, he believes more is better.

[T-Slow]

Hello all,

As some of you know, I run masters track, teach elementary school and coach track there as well. Well, I just added a new hat, coaching a 200/400m hopeful who has some raw talent, but has a long history of injury problems and inconsistent training.

We decided to give this outdoor season a full effort. Obviously, I am very limited in my ability to maneuver as the season is very near its beginning, so I guess we will have to be realistic about the potential for progress, but I remain hopeful. I think his expectations are probably somewhat optimistic, but I'm not going to say much at the moment.

He ran a few indoor meets this season despite having a painful foot problem. He ran 35 flat FAT in the indoor 300m on a flat track. He ran 6.95 in the 60m as well. I would say that he has some very good natural talent, but training has been very inconsistent, and his training age must be considered low. His technique is not a strength either.

His PB's are 10.85 in the 100, 21.62 in the outdoor 200m, and 34.80 in the 300m indoors. He is 6'5, so running indoors may not be the best indicator of his overall ability.

He wants to run at the Canadian National trials, thus must achieve 21.60 in the 200m, and 48.30 in the 400m. Nationals are from June 27-30th. As you can see, we've got our work cut out for us!

I will keep a journal, but here is the basic breakdown: we did a 6 week GPP, keeping everything on the grass or turf with minimal turn work, followed by a rest/test week. In the test week, he ran the 300m in 34.50 and the 150m in 16.31, both hand timed. They were run outdoors in 4C weather.

We were both slightly disappointed with his times (I don't know why I was disappointed, he had been doing zero training prior!), but hugely encouraged by his increasing fitness. Prior to the GPP, he would not have been able to run a flat out 300m and walk away as if it was no big deal, then run a 150 about 20 minutes later.

I asked him to run the 300m smoothly, as he usually goes out like a kamikaze and drags ass home, so that may not have helped.

After the rest/test, I transitioned him for about 10 days into some shorter speed work (accels, a couple of 50's), and we booked a trip to a southern meet with a fantastic track, excellent weather, and an appropriate level of competition. Charlie's advice from the taper DVD was ringing in my head, "go to the conditions if they wont come to you!"

He had lane 5, +1.7 wind, 25C weather with some humidity, and a bunch of guys running 21-22 to mix it up with. Unfortunately, he strained his groin in his run-out just prior to his race! Shit! "Now we know why you don't race coming right out of the GPP" was ESTI's deadpan response when I told him the result. I told the athlete that it was my fault for pushing into racing too quickly. Hopefully he isn't too discouraged mentally, because we still have a lot of work to do.

What is my best move here? I am mindful of Charlie's words of playing to an athlete's strengths- this guy really benefits from speed but has always been hurt from it.

Should I move into a carefully managed KK style transition phase, waiting until early June to intensify the speed through some 200m races and appropriate Charlie style short to long 400 sessions? I have to be careful with speed, as though he responds very well to speed work from an improvement standpoint, he has consistently hurt himself in the past. Usually he runs a fast 150 or 200 in practice and ends up with stress fractures in his shins, or foot issues. I suspect a lot of this stemmed from running the turn indoors, which is suicidal at 6'5 with some decent 150 speed (he's run consistently in the mid-high 15's in practice in the past).

Fitness is also a major concern, so I consulted with ESTI and we thought that keeping the 5x200 in once a week would be wise instead of going with 2x2x200 at this point.

I was thinking of following the transition plan for 4 weeks with some 200m races to help his speed starting in late May, transitioning into some 400m Short to Long type workouts in early June, and trying to run some decent races in mid-June. I have to confirm what date he needs to hit a qualifying time by. Also, we may need to find some good conditions elsewhere so he can have a chance at a decent time.

KitKat, do you have any advice? Would anyone else care to weigh in?

[John]

T-Slow,
how old is he?

How long ago were his PB's?

It appears he has some significant time away from training till he started GPP, how long and what did he do?

[T-Slow]

Hi John,

He just turned 23. He sort-of trained for indoors and ran the 6.95 and 35 flat this year. His 21.62 was from two years ago, and he ran 21.68 last summer off of virtually zero base, and workouts that mainly consisted of 3x30, 3x60, 2x200. Of course, he ended up hurt again and the 21.68 was his only open race. He allegedly split 47.2 in a 4x400 relay the same day but I didn't see it, don't trust his former coach's hand times, and it isn't a FAT time so I don't count it.

He ran some indoor races in January and then didn't train much due to a recurring foot problem (either a high ankle sprain or a stress fracture). We have seen Dr. Galea about it and are awaiting an MRI.

On Angela's advice I kept him off turns, and we stayed off the track 95% of the time during the GPP, only venturing on for limited reps to allow a gentle transition for his time trial on the track.

[Nikoluski]

It seems you should be looking for consistency before anything else. The GPP period was a good first step. Of course, there are certain dates, but you can't push things beyond his current limits. And of course, when there are many things to work on within a limited time frame, some of them will remain 'unsolved' until next season. Be patient and first look for a healthy body (I know you do, just saying...). All the best!